(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-17 09:45 pm (UTC)
For goodness sakes! I think most teachers can be impartial, or at least present non-biased information, without being told they must explicitly balance the two sources. Even if the students do make a decision one way or another.

credible, legitimate opposing view will be presented
We could say "shoot yourself in the foot" ... but that might be a little rude ;) But it doesn't make sense with history (considering until recently history was recorded - primarily - through the eyes of the victors not the losers), and I'm sure other subjects are the same.

And yet *shrugs* I really can't help but think that this is another way in which America is trying to stop independant (or non-regulated) thought. Like actually being able to form a (true) opinion by knowing both sides of a story. Goodness knows they probably have the "opposing view" shown to them every day at home, why not allow them to see the less pretty side of things.

Not to mention having to go through the red-tape (and personal opinion against what you want to teach by your superiors) would surely put off a lot of teachers.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

May 2009

S M T W T F S
      12
3 4 5 6 7 89
1011 12 13141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags